I’ve played two events since my last update…the TarHeel Tour event at Charlotte National GC and a Nationwide Tour Monday qualifier in Chattanooga.
In the Tarheel Tour event, I finished 35th with rounds of 73-69. I wasn’t hitting it very well either round, but I held both together to essentially make the cut on the number. Since the first round was cancelled, the event was paid based on the last two rounds. I also finished second in the second-day shootout. The Shootout is a single-round event which is open to anybody falling outside the projected cut after the first round. It’s a small entry fee opportunity to make a little money if you had an off first round.
One aspect of my game that I was very happy with was my putting. This really held together a second round where I was hitting it all over the map. In particular, I made clutch putts over the last few holes. I made a small technical change last week that is helping me to control the force and direction of my stroke through and past impact.
Unfortunately, it was a very small payday because of a flaw in how most mini tour events are run. The players who finish the worst out of those who make the cut have to split money between too many players. For example, in a typical 120 player Tarheel Tour event, the top 38 and ties make the cut. If 43 players make the cut and there is a 6-way tie for 38th, those 6 players split 38th place money. So, the 37th place player may make about $600 while the 6 tied for 38th will make about $100. In a PGA or Nationwide Tour event, money would be added so there wasn’t such a sharp difference between players who finish last and “almost-last”.
I definitely understand the finances behind this policy…there simply isn’t any money to be added to a mini-tour purse to make the payout among the last place finishers equitable. In a typical event, I don’t really have a problem with the policy because the players who make the cut and finish last are generally the guys who give up on a round and shoot a million. In this case, I think it’s an appropriate “penalty” for giving up. However, when an event is shortened to two rounds with no final round after the cut, there isn’t an opportunity for players differentiate themselves by giving up on a round. In this type of situation, I think the payout should be adjusted among the lower-place finishers so there isn’t such an enormous difference between those who make the cut on the number and those who play one shot better over the two rounds.
There are dozens of “common sense” things like this you run into on the mini tours that will probably never be addressed. The fact is that the tours are usually run by one or two people who put in a lot of personal time and effort to make these events work. The organizers do an exceptional job given the resources they have to work with. Unfortunately, the little details such as last-place payouts often just aren’t a priority.
So, on to Chattanooga. I took my new toys, the Bushnell Pinseeker 1500 Laser Rangefinder with Slope and Eyeline Golf Green Reading Level, with me to the practice round. The Bushnell performed as expected. The Green Reading Level was a bit touchy because the greens had been freshly punched (more on this below) and it was difficult to find a flat spot to lay the level. It took a bunch of wiggling and averaging to get a good feel for where the fall lines were. However, in the end the level provided some exceptionally accurate and useful information. I absolutely knew where the fall line was on all 18 holes. This made it very easy to read the green and commit to my read. I had one of the better putting days I’ve had in a while because of the added confidence in my reads.
Unfortunately, I missed making the playoff by two shots. My ball striking wasn’t exactly where I wanted it to be, but I was holding it together with my putting. A late-round double bogey knocked me off track but I still had a chance with 3 holes to go. I hit one to 3 feet on 16 and had the putt bounce left and lip out. Then, I birdied 17 before just missing birdie on the final hole. Despite missing the qualifier, I am very happy and excited about my putting and the usefulness of the Green Reading Level.
As I mentioned above, the greens at Bear Trace GC were freshly punched over the last two weeks. This has happened before in Monday qualifiers and is grossly unacceptable. I can’t understand how the local PGA section can fall flat on their face in coordinating this with the golf course. When scheduling the event, a simple question - “do you expect to punch the greens within one month of the event?” - would make sure this never happens. Courses know well in advance their maintenance schedules. If a course absolutely has to punch the greens within a month of the event, then hold the event at another course. It’s ridiculous to hold an $350 entry-fee event with so much at stake on greens that putt like the Plinko maching from the “Price is Right”.
Someone I played a practice round with in Knoxville made a great point. Either require that the PGA sections do an exceptional job of holding the qualifiers or take it away and let the PGA Tour do it. Personally, I don’t think the different local sections will ever be able to conduct an event uniformly well across all parts of the country. There are just too many variables in personnel and course setup philosophy. The PGA Tour, however, would probably do a good job at selecting courses and running events uniformly well throughout the season.
I’ve got a few days off before I head back to Charlotte next week for another TarHeel Tour event at Rocky River GC. This is good because I have a muscle strain in my chest that I need to rest for a day or two.